2 Comments

  • Looks nice, i’ve been using CWSandbox a little after your post on it and it is excellent. Has saved me messing around and running the risk of infecting myself.

    Next time i have a false positive to play with or get a dodgy file from somewhere i’ll give this one a go…

  • @Jonny

    Nice indeed – this one feels less thorough than CWSandbox but more polished. Usual difference between research product and business product I guess. :)

Comments are closed.