<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThreatExpert.com &#8211; behavioral file analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/web/threatexpert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/threatexpert/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/threatexpert/#comment-13163</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=552#comment-13163</guid>
		<description>@Jonny

Nice indeed - this one feels less thorough than CWSandbox but more polished. Usual difference between research product and business product I guess. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonny</p>
<p>Nice indeed &#8211; this one feels less thorough than CWSandbox but more polished. Usual difference between research product and business product I guess. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/threatexpert/#comment-13158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=552#comment-13158</guid>
		<description>Looks nice, i&#039;ve been using CWSandbox a little after your post on it and it is excellent. Has saved me messing around and running the risk of infecting myself.

Next time i have a false positive to play with or get a dodgy file from somewhere i&#039;ll give this one a go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice, i&#8217;ve been using CWSandbox a little after your post on it and it is excellent. Has saved me messing around and running the risk of infecting myself.</p>
<p>Next time i have a false positive to play with or get a dodgy file from somewhere i&#8217;ll give this one a go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

