<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pingdom.com &#8211; comprehensive uptime monitor service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wasitup.com &#8211; simple site downtime alerts &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/#comment-22235</link>
		<dc:creator>wasitup.com &#8211; simple site downtime alerts &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=504#comment-22235</guid>
		<description>[...] June 15th, 2010 Web &#124; Replywasitup.com &#8211; simple site downtime alerts I am very fond of Pingdom for uptime monitoring, most comprehensive solution. On other hand free account is only good for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 15th, 2010 Web | Replywasitup.com &ndash; simple site downtime alerts I am very fond of Pingdom for uptime monitoring, most comprehensive solution. On other hand free account is only good for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/#comment-11270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=504#comment-11270</guid>
		<description>One minute sounds pretty good. You are right - short downtimes are missed when interval of checking is 30 mins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One minute sounds pretty good. You are right &#8211; short downtimes are missed when interval of checking is 30 mins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/#comment-11267</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=504#comment-11267</guid>
		<description>@Ishan

Well, I&#039;d say cheap hosting is unreliable. :) It is not impossible to get extremely reliable hosting, but it will come with adequately high price tag.

I think half an hour is too large interval (even if it is common for free services of such kind). It won&#039;t catch short downtimes, that can easily add up to considerable sum over time.

Pingdom shortest available interval is one minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ishan</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;d say cheap hosting is unreliable. :) It is not impossible to get extremely reliable hosting, but it will come with adequately high price tag.</p>
<p>I think half an hour is too large interval (even if it is common for free services of such kind). It won&#8217;t catch short downtimes, that can easily add up to considerable sum over time.</p>
<p>Pingdom shortest available interval is one minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/pingdom/#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=504#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>Nice article Rarst. I agree that web hosting is normally quite unreliable. I had an instance of my website going down at a time when some advertiser wanted to review the website, and that cost me the advertising deal. I sometimes wish there was a way to have website traffic redirected to some backup website in those instances. It might be hard to keep backup website in sync with the master one, but I feel it would be worth the effort.

I also use a similar service to continuously monitor my website. I use &quot;mon.itor.us&quot; for that (that&#039;s the actual website name). It checks my website once every half hour, and sends me alerts whenever it is down. This one is also completely free, and I haven&#039;t seen any limits on free account. Really like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Rarst. I agree that web hosting is normally quite unreliable. I had an instance of my website going down at a time when some advertiser wanted to review the website, and that cost me the advertising deal. I sometimes wish there was a way to have website traffic redirected to some backup website in those instances. It might be hard to keep backup website in sync with the master one, but I feel it would be worth the effort.</p>
<p>I also use a similar service to continuously monitor my website. I use &#8220;mon.itor.us&#8221; for that (that&#8217;s the actual website name). It checks my website once every half hour, and sends me alerts whenever it is down. This one is also completely free, and I haven&#8217;t seen any limits on free account. Really like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

