<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine months blogging milestone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7681</guid>
		<description>@Donace

I am not qualified to make careful SEO estimations, at least yet. :) I will get to it eventually...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donace</p>
<p>I am not qualified to make careful SEO estimations, at least yet. :) I will get to it eventually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donace &#124; The Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7680</link>
		<dc:creator>Donace &#124; The Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7680</guid>
		<description>@Rarst; I don&#039;t claim to be an expert either.

I also believe &#039;you get better by providing better content&#039; but you may be writing Shakespeare, Millersque works but if no-one knows about them it is useless.

Re: you point about delicious...it not about the direct or immediate traffic form it.

I propose a small experiment in your next post DO NOT submit it to delicious.

Check your serp ranking for the posts main keyword; 24hrs later check it again (to eliminate wordpress initial boost.)

THEN submit it to delicious using your keyword in the description and tags and check your serp rankings 12hrs or so after this (to eliminate initial boost).

You SHOULD see a boost in the serp rankings; it may be one it may be a few places different.

Extrapolate from this the possible effects to submitting it to other Social sites that will help boost SERP ranking and therefore Search engine traffic...which is the targeted money making traffic and NOT the social traffic you COULD/WILL receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rarst; I don&#8217;t claim to be an expert either.</p>
<p>I also believe &#8216;you get better by providing better content&#8217; but you may be writing Shakespeare, Millersque works but if no-one knows about them it is useless.</p>
<p>Re: you point about delicious&#8230;it not about the direct or immediate traffic form it.</p>
<p>I propose a small experiment in your next post DO NOT submit it to delicious.</p>
<p>Check your serp ranking for the posts main keyword; 24hrs later check it again (to eliminate wordpress initial boost.)</p>
<p>THEN submit it to delicious using your keyword in the description and tags and check your serp rankings 12hrs or so after this (to eliminate initial boost).</p>
<p>You SHOULD see a boost in the serp rankings; it may be one it may be a few places different.</p>
<p>Extrapolate from this the possible effects to submitting it to other Social sites that will help boost SERP ranking and therefore Search engine traffic&#8230;which is the targeted money making traffic and NOT the social traffic you COULD/WILL receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7677</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7677</guid>
		<description>@Donace

Clearly I am no expert. I just follow &quot;never ask barber if you need a haircut&quot;.

There are a lot of stuff that claims to be so much value for bloggers. Somehow I don&#039;t see any of my high-profile blogger acquaintances using such stuff.

I just think you don&#039;t get better by searching for shortcuts, you get better by providing better content and getting better community that is thankful to you.

PS I have my post auto-submitted to delicious. Brought me whole of 5 (five) visitors in last three months. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donace</p>
<p>Clearly I am no expert. I just follow &#8220;never ask barber if you need a haircut&#8221;.</p>
<p>There are a lot of stuff that claims to be so much value for bloggers. Somehow I don&#8217;t see any of my high-profile blogger acquaintances using such stuff.</p>
<p>I just think you don&#8217;t get better by searching for shortcuts, you get better by providing better content and getting better community that is thankful to you.</p>
<p>PS I have my post auto-submitted to delicious. Brought me whole of 5 (five) visitors in last three months. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donace &#124; The Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7676</link>
		<dc:creator>Donace &#124; The Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7676</guid>
		<description>Let me reiterate the pros. 

1) Its not evil! any &#039;socialite&#039; will submit their stuff to their favourite social engines, this just helps do it a bit faster!

2) its not about PR! its never been about PR...PR is just a number...

3)...its all about serps and this is not limited to google but yahoo msn and ask also.

4) Not wanting to requote my last months post but not all links are equal there are all weighed differently and domain authority is one of the many key factors which social sites have.

5) PLUS with the new adsense roll out of &#039;behavioural adds&#039; your conversion rates form social trafiic in theory should increase....

I&#039;ll add more points later on msn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me reiterate the pros. </p>
<p>1) Its not evil! any &#8216;socialite&#8217; will submit their stuff to their favourite social engines, this just helps do it a bit faster!</p>
<p>2) its not about PR! its never been about PR&#8230;PR is just a number&#8230;</p>
<p>3)&#8230;its all about serps and this is not limited to google but yahoo msn and ask also.</p>
<p>4) Not wanting to requote my last months post but not all links are equal there are all weighed differently and domain authority is one of the many key factors which social sites have.</p>
<p>5) PLUS with the new adsense roll out of &#8216;behavioural adds&#8217; your conversion rates form social trafiic in theory should increase&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add more points later on msn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7675</guid>
		<description>@Donace

Yeah, automated software to gather PR-less links is sure sounds like a good plan to gain favor of single dominant search engine. Not. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donace</p>
<p>Yeah, automated software to gather PR-less links is sure sounds like a good plan to gain favor of single dominant search engine. Not. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donace &#124; The Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>Donace &#124; The Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>Search engine traffic is indeed great; I mean I had a one month hiatus and was still averaging 140 hits per day, not &#039;brilliant&#039; but good nonetheless.

I have also been considering setting up a more robust posting schedule as a I see a 35% increase of traffic on post days but I am in fact way to swamped with work!

and yes the best SEO recommendation once you have done all the implicit things is to garner links; I would ofc recommend my own post on the best link that I wrote last month! and my latest favourite software traffic android ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engine traffic is indeed great; I mean I had a one month hiatus and was still averaging 140 hits per day, not &#8216;brilliant&#8217; but good nonetheless.</p>
<p>I have also been considering setting up a more robust posting schedule as a I see a 35% increase of traffic on post days but I am in fact way to swamped with work!</p>
<p>and yes the best SEO recommendation once you have done all the implicit things is to garner links; I would ofc recommend my own post on the best link that I wrote last month! and my latest favourite software traffic android ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7671</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7671</guid>
		<description>@Jonny

Well, I don&#039;t consider this design great but it&#039;s not ugly (already a lot as for me), fits my taste and works for my readers (it seems). :) I just need to finish tweaks at last and let it cook for a few months.

On stats my best advice is to ignore what other blogs post about those. :) At least until you start encountering blogs that are smaller than yours and believe me that takes time, lol.

Thanks for being around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonny</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t consider this design great but it&#8217;s not ugly (already a lot as for me), fits my taste and works for my readers (it seems). :) I just need to finish tweaks at last and let it cook for a few months.</p>
<p>On stats my best advice is to ignore what other blogs post about those. :) At least until you start encountering blogs that are smaller than yours and believe me that takes time, lol.</p>
<p>Thanks for being around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7668</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7668</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see goals being achieved here. I think the design is great by the way.

Some really good stats there, you&#039;re putting me to shame......must write some more stuff :( Well Done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see goals being achieved here. I think the design is great by the way.</p>
<p>Some really good stats there, you&#8217;re putting me to shame&#8230;&#8230;must write some more stuff :( Well Done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7661</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7661</guid>
		<description>@Sjeltur

Yep online is no freaking different. Except that social is additionally perverted when stupid things like running around different services and amassing thousands &quot;friends&quot; for the only sake of pitching them your links to visit or &quot;promote&quot;.

I like to know that there are real people gathering here little by little. Not thousands of them but they know that they can always leave a comment here and get reply. :)

That&#039;s better &quot;social&quot; than spinning followera counter on Twitter. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sjeltur</p>
<p>Yep online is no freaking different. Except that social is additionally perverted when stupid things like running around different services and amassing thousands &#8220;friends&#8221; for the only sake of pitching them your links to visit or &#8220;promote&#8221;.</p>
<p>I like to know that there are real people gathering here little by little. Not thousands of them but they know that they can always leave a comment here and get reply. :)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s better &#8220;social&#8221; than spinning followera counter on Twitter. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sjeltur</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/nine-months-blogging/#comment-7646</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjeltur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=348#comment-7646</guid>
		<description>Funny to see your line about &quot;social&quot; and it is coming back in your comments...
Probably that is also (uh... also..??) my failure.... I should be way more social... but hey.... my real life friends even consider me non-social = so how the &amp;$#@ should I do that online....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny to see your line about &#8220;social&#8221; and it is coming back in your comments&#8230;<br />
Probably that is also (uh&#8230; also..??) my failure&#8230;. I should be way more social&#8230; but hey&#8230;. my real life friends even consider me non-social = so how the &amp;$#@ should I do that online&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

