<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Google’s opinion on site safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: McAfee Site Advisor tells how safe files and links are &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/#comment-15299</link>
		<dc:creator>McAfee Site Advisor tells how safe files and links are &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=323#comment-15299</guid>
		<description>[...] had posted about Google Safe Browsing, that tells if site (and its online neighborhood) considered harmful. Checks by Google make sense, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had posted about Google Safe Browsing, that tells if site (and its online neighborhood) considered harmful. Checks by Google make sense, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucuri NBIM &#8211; uptime and security log for web sites &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/#comment-9742</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucuri NBIM &#8211; uptime and security log for web sites &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=323#comment-9742</guid>
		<description>[...] in blacklists (such as Google Safe Browsing and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in blacklists (such as Google Safe Browsing and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/#comment-7283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=323#comment-7283</guid>
		<description>@Lyndi

Well, as I wrote this tool is pretty slow at crawling. :) Or maybe it just puts priority on sites noticed spreading malware and doesn&#039;t care much about rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lyndi</p>
<p>Well, as I wrote this tool is pretty slow at crawling. :) Or maybe it just puts priority on sites noticed spreading malware and doesn&#8217;t care much about rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndi</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/web/google-safe-browsing/#comment-7281</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=323#comment-7281</guid>
		<description>This is all new to me. One learns something every day. I was glad to see that Google says my site is not &#039;bad&#039;. What worries me a bit is the sentence that informed me: &quot;Google has not visited this site within the past 90 days.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all new to me. One learns something every day. I was glad to see that Google says my site is not &#8216;bad&#8217;. What worries me a bit is the sentence that informed me: &#8220;Google has not visited this site within the past 90 days.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

