<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Remind me &#8211; what is so hip about real time?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/</link> <description>cynical thoughts on software, web, etc</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Refine Google search with time frames &#124; Rarst.net</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/#comment-13761</link> <dc:creator>Refine Google search with time frames &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=534#comment-13761</guid> <description>[...] whole real time thing is crazy but it brought to search general awareness of time. If you track what had happened in last minute [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whole real time thing is crazy but it brought to search general awareness of time. If you track what had happened in last minute [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/#comment-12569</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:52:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=534#comment-12569</guid> <description>@JimIM is around for so long and no one ever glorified its &quot;real time&quot; awesomeness. :)When things that are nothing special are suddenly served as revelations - you know you are looking at bubble.As for me Twitter is just a place to vent. It sucks as communication tool and those who regard it as such usually mean you-read-my-advertisements-and-feel-glorified-that-I-follow-you under communication. It will be fine as place to vent, but I think most of retarded real-time values will wither away.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim</p><p>IM is around for so long and no one ever glorified its &#8220;real time&#8221; awesomeness. :)</p><p>When things that are nothing special are suddenly served as revelations &#8211; you know you are looking at bubble.</p><p>As for me Twitter is just a place to vent. It sucks as communication tool and those who regard it as such usually mean you-read-my-advertisements-and-feel-glorified-that-I-follow-you under communication. It will be fine as place to vent, but I think most of retarded real-time values will wither away.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Sefton</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/#comment-12565</link> <dc:creator>Jim Sefton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=534#comment-12565</guid> <description>Interesting post, I completely agree with you.I dart in and out of twitter depending on my mood and how busy I am, but it is not exactly part of my daily workflow, it is more of a hobby.I do find 99% of my messages are now &quot;real time&quot; though... IM, SMS, twitter, even email is so fast now the messages are more of a one liner than a proper message.In the old days (wow, how old do I sound now?) I used to send and receive proper emails which were worth reading. I cant remember when that last happened though and it is a shame. I does seem like everyone (myself included, I suppose) has become more impatient, and everyone needs to know things straight away.I&#039;m not sure what will happen with Twitter... the novelty seems to be wearing off with a lot of people now, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if we see the revival of the blog at some point, with people getting away from the self-imposed character limit of twitter. Probably not in its current form though, as I think twitter has proven the &quot;social&quot; side of things works, so perhaps some kind of hybrid will emerge... &quot;blitter&quot; perhaps? LOL</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, I completely agree with you.</p><p>I dart in and out of twitter depending on my mood and how busy I am, but it is not exactly part of my daily workflow, it is more of a hobby.</p><p>I do find 99% of my messages are now &#8220;real time&#8221; though&#8230; IM, SMS, twitter, even email is so fast now the messages are more of a one liner than a proper message.</p><p>In the old days (wow, how old do I sound now?) I used to send and receive proper emails which were worth reading. I cant remember when that last happened though and it is a shame. I does seem like everyone (myself included, I suppose) has become more impatient, and everyone needs to know things straight away.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure what will happen with Twitter&#8230; the novelty seems to be wearing off with a lot of people now, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if we see the revival of the blog at some point, with people getting away from the self-imposed character limit of twitter. Probably not in its current form though, as I think twitter has proven the &#8220;social&#8221; side of things works, so perhaps some kind of hybrid will emerge&#8230; &#8220;blitter&#8221; perhaps? LOL</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/#comment-12381</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:08:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=534#comment-12381</guid> <description>@AngeloYeah, techies are being large part of it. Twitterfeed had recently implemented new protocol [with weird name I can&#039;t spell]. Anyway my posts are now tweeted in seconds after they go live at blog, instead of hours as it was before.1st thought - wow this is so cool.
2nd thought - and why exactly I give a damn when it gets tweeted? same people will see is and same people will ignore it.Twitter is probably worst case of real time overhype. In fact it doesn&#039;t have to be real time at all. I can easily miss a day and read my stream later. If I can&#039;t - that means I am trying to chug more information than I am capable of digesting.And Twitter search is even worse than Twitter itself. It is presented like some search miracle, but can&#039;t even keep two weeks of tweets in its crippled real time memory.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Angelo</p><p>Yeah, techies are being large part of it. Twitterfeed had recently implemented new protocol [with weird name I can't spell]. Anyway my posts are now tweeted in seconds after they go live at blog, instead of hours as it was before.</p><p>1st thought &#8211; wow this is so cool.<br
/> 2nd thought &#8211; and why exactly I give a damn when it gets tweeted? same people will see is and same people will ignore it.</p><p>Twitter is probably worst case of real time overhype. In fact it doesn&#8217;t have to be real time at all. I can easily miss a day and read my stream later. If I can&#8217;t &#8211; that means I am trying to chug more information than I am capable of digesting.</p><p>And Twitter search is even worse than Twitter itself. It is presented like some search miracle, but can&#8217;t even keep two weeks of tweets in its crippled real time memory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angelo R.</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/thoughts/real-time/#comment-12380</link> <dc:creator>Angelo R.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:21:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=534#comment-12380</guid> <description>I&#039;m with you 100% on this Rarst. I think what happened is that when developers figured out &quot;real-time&quot; updates were possible they were ecstatic. The idea that the internet, a place where BBS once ruled could be brought into near real-time was a huge feat for programmers, and they hyped that up. People want things to be fast, and now we&#039;ve worked our way to the point of near instant information.Too bad we just can&#039;t handle it. I twitter, but after about 5 minutes of staring at my stream updating every few seconds it comes too much. I have to ignore it for a while. Not only is there too much going on, it&#039;s all happening too fast to read an comprehend. Not to mention if you need to respond to something, by the time you finish it&#039;s pushed off the screen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you 100% on this Rarst. I think what happened is that when developers figured out &#8220;real-time&#8221; updates were possible they were ecstatic. The idea that the internet, a place where BBS once ruled could be brought into near real-time was a huge feat for programmers, and they hyped that up. People want things to be fast, and now we&#8217;ve worked our way to the point of near instant information.</p><p>Too bad we just can&#8217;t handle it. I twitter, but after about 5 minutes of staring at my stream updating every few seconds it comes too much. I have to ignore it for a while. Not only is there too much going on, it&#8217;s all happening too fast to read an comprehend. Not to mention if you need to respond to something, by the time you finish it&#8217;s pushed off the screen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk

Served from: ibanez.liquidweb.com @ 2010-03-12 23:00:43 -->