<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Total Commander [software worth buying]</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/</link> <description>cynical thoughts on software, web, etc</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dicas Sobre Backup &#124; KTecNet</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16778</link> <dc:creator>Dicas Sobre Backup &#124; KTecNet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16778</guid> <description>[...] exemplo, eu lembrei que uma copia do Total Commander no disco rígido externo tem algumas senhas de servidores FTP [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exemplo, eu lembrei que uma copia do Total Commander no disco rígido externo tem algumas senhas de servidores FTP [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Delete too long paths (folder trees) with robocopy &#124; Rarst.net</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16685</link> <dc:creator>Delete too long paths (folder trees) with robocopy &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16685</guid> <description>[...] I was unable to delete.After few attempts and tools like Unlocker failed (sadly I had no access to Total Commander at moment) I tried to simply browse those folders and umpteenth levels deeper I got message that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was unable to delete.After few attempts and tools like Unlocker failed (sadly I had no access to Total Commander at moment) I tried to simply browse those folders and umpteenth levels deeper I got message that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16523</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16523</guid> <description>@OAlexanderI like tweaking, but definitely not too much tweaking - that burns me out. I think Total Commander is nice balance of defaults you can use out of the box, but can deeply customize for yourself as well.I&#039;ve spent DOS times mostly on Volkov Commander and later on Dos Navigator. Later was seriously more advanced than all of competition.Everything rocks for search indeed. It&#039;s a rare case for app to do something so simple in so awesome way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OAlexander</p><p>I like tweaking, but definitely not too much tweaking &#8211; that burns me out. I think Total Commander is nice balance of defaults you can use out of the box, but can deeply customize for yourself as well.</p><p>I&#8217;ve spent DOS times mostly on Volkov Commander and later on Dos Navigator. Later was seriously more advanced than all of competition.</p><p>Everything rocks for search indeed. It&#8217;s a rare case for app to do something so simple in so awesome way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OAlexander</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16497</link> <dc:creator>OAlexander</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:26:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16497</guid> <description>As I said:Rolls Royce file manager = Directory Opus.
Price = also Rolls Royce.And yes, as you say, it is &quot;about twice the price of Total Commander? It sure is expensive. Well, if it is still afloat then worth it to some people.&quot;Besides an immense lot of features it offers next to complete  configurability, which means, it works practically exactly as a file manager would work if I had designed it from scratch to exactly my liking. This includes, that I can replace icons if I don&#039;t like the suggested one - an each icon can have a left, right and middle click functionality. So you can cram a lot of functionality into little space.If it happens to have a bug, I post it in the forum and I can be reasonably sure that it is fixed inside the next couple of minor updates. For me it took a while to configure it, killing of some garish colours, etc., but this is a &quot;once in a lifetime&quot; job, and the configuration is easily transferable, including to USB, from where it also works effortlessly.For a long time I used &quot;PowerDesk Explorer&quot;, which I liked a lot, but they never removed what for me was a major bug. I also liked xlplorer² for a while, because it was cute, but in the end it was a romance that never really worked out and I never elevated it to Explorer replacement. Of the rest, I don&#039;t know what I have not tried - Even ZTree, a character based (means MS-Dos mode) file manager, created with the fabulous XTree of the MS-Dos days in mind; then you were either a Norton Commander or an Xtree person ;).For me the file manager is the most important tool on the computer, and I almost always have it open. The only other tool I need here is &quot;Everything&quot; (http://www.voidtools.com/), which I think you recommended a while ago, and which became quickly indispensable for me. No quicker way to find a file by name - no matter where on the computer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said:</p><p>Rolls Royce file manager = Directory Opus.<br
/> Price = also Rolls Royce.</p><p>And yes, as you say, it is &#8220;about twice the price of Total Commander? It sure is expensive. Well, if it is still afloat then worth it to some people.&#8221;</p><p>Besides an immense lot of features it offers next to complete  configurability, which means, it works practically exactly as a file manager would work if I had designed it from scratch to exactly my liking. This includes, that I can replace icons if I don&#8217;t like the suggested one &#8211; an each icon can have a left, right and middle click functionality. So you can cram a lot of functionality into little space.</p><p>If it happens to have a bug, I post it in the forum and I can be reasonably sure that it is fixed inside the next couple of minor updates. For me it took a while to configure it, killing of some garish colours, etc., but this is a &#8220;once in a lifetime&#8221; job, and the configuration is easily transferable, including to USB, from where it also works effortlessly.</p><p>For a long time I used &#8220;PowerDesk Explorer&#8221;, which I liked a lot, but they never removed what for me was a major bug. I also liked xlplorer² for a while, because it was cute, but in the end it was a romance that never really worked out and I never elevated it to Explorer replacement. Of the rest, I don&#8217;t know what I have not tried &#8211; Even ZTree, a character based (means MS-Dos mode) file manager, created with the fabulous XTree of the MS-Dos days in mind; then you were either a Norton Commander or an Xtree person ;).</p><p>For me the file manager is the most important tool on the computer, and I almost always have it open. The only other tool I need here is &#8220;Everything&#8221; (<a
href="http://www.voidtools.com/">http://www.voidtools.com/</a>), which I think you recommended a while ago, and which became quickly indispensable for me. No quicker way to find a file by name &#8211; no matter where on the computer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marius</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16479</link> <dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:06:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16479</guid> <description>@Rarst
My bad, sry ;).@kelltic
XYplorer have very interesting approach with internal script engine, but misses another few features.
About Xplorer2, well I liked more his predecessor 2xExplorer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rarst<br
/> My bad, sry ;).</p><p>@kelltic<br
/> XYplorer have very interesting approach with internal script engine, but misses another few features.<br
/> About Xplorer2, well I liked more his predecessor 2xExplorer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16473</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16473</guid> <description>@MariusThanks, I know those features but forgot to include in post. Hadn&#039;t used multi rename lately, but own associations is awesome for portable.btw file queues are listed in post. :)@kellticI stick with defaults for those, but fonts and colors are very customizable.In case of Total Commander you can take your time and evaluate all functions properly before purchase. Excellent policy indeed.I consider Windows Explorer absolutely unusable as file manager. It is poor attempt to dumb down file managing, haunted by performance and usability issues as far as I can remember.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marius</p><p>Thanks, I know those features but forgot to include in post. Hadn&#8217;t used multi rename lately, but own associations is awesome for portable.</p><p>btw file queues are listed in post. :)</p><p>@kelltic</p><p>I stick with defaults for those, but fonts and colors are very customizable.</p><p>In case of Total Commander you can take your time and evaluate all functions properly before purchase. Excellent policy indeed.</p><p>I consider Windows Explorer absolutely unusable as file manager. It is poor attempt to dumb down file managing, haunted by performance and usability issues as far as I can remember.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kelltic</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16466</link> <dc:creator>kelltic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16466</guid> <description>I agree that freeware is not always the best answer and I appreciate your braving the storm to do a writeup on this program. I hope to see similar articles on occasion.I tried this - and every similar program I could find - back when I was looking for something to replace Windows Explorer. I did like Total Commander but, in the end, I purchased Xplorer2. Probably not one of my better decisions and the functions, available in the pro version that prompted me to upgrade from the freebie, turned out to be too cumbersome to bother with and didn&#039;t work all the time.  Another one I liked was XYplorer - for its speediness. Funny thing is, once I installed Search GT, I went back to using Windows Explorer.I think Total Commander was a little beyond my comprehension and I was too impatient to learn how to use it. Looking at the pic here I remember I didn&#039;t like the heavy bold text.  Well, I&#039;m a little (very little) wiser now and when I&#039;m ready to purchase another such program, it will be this one. Gotta love the developer&#039;s attitude. Makes me want to pay up right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that freeware is not always the best answer and I appreciate your braving the storm to do a writeup on this program. I hope to see similar articles on occasion.</p><p>I tried this &#8211; and every similar program I could find &#8211; back when I was looking for something to replace Windows Explorer. I did like Total Commander but, in the end, I purchased Xplorer2. Probably not one of my better decisions and the functions, available in the pro version that prompted me to upgrade from the freebie, turned out to be too cumbersome to bother with and didn&#8217;t work all the time.  Another one I liked was XYplorer &#8211; for its speediness. Funny thing is, once I installed Search GT, I went back to using Windows Explorer.</p><p>I think Total Commander was a little beyond my comprehension and I was too impatient to learn how to use it. Looking at the pic here I remember I didn&#8217;t like the heavy bold text.  Well, I&#8217;m a little (very little) wiser now and when I&#8217;m ready to purchase another such program, it will be this one. Gotta love the developer&#8217;s attitude. Makes me want to pay up right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marius</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/total-commander/#comment-16453</link> <dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:53:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=614#comment-16453</guid> <description>I can add few more features:
- multi rename
- internal associations (very nice when you use TC as a portable app)
- queue for copy/move file.Over all in my opinion this is the best file manager.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can add few more features:<br
/> - multi rename<br
/> - internal associations (very nice when you use TC as a portable app)<br
/> - queue for copy/move file.</p><p>Over all in my opinion this is the best file manager.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk

Served from: www.rarst.net @ 2010-09-10 08:47:19 -->