<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Saving browsing bandwidth &#8211; is Opera alone enough?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/</link> <description>cynical thoughts on software, web, etc</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-13</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.Rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-13</guid> <description>Opera Mini is excellent on mobile phone but I am not sure it belongs to desktop like people try to use it.I think it&#039;s unlikely for Opera to implement really functional ad blocker. It may be relatively easy to code but it has a lot of upkeep costs - updating block lists, making sure that filters don&#039;t interfere with non-ad content... It simply isn&#039;t their priority.Anyway Opera 9.5x is significant update but only a milestone before major version 10. Things might change.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera Mini is excellent on mobile phone but I am not sure it belongs to desktop like people try to use it.</p><p>I think it&#8217;s unlikely for Opera to implement really functional ad blocker. It may be relatively easy to code but it has a lot of upkeep costs &#8211; updating block lists, making sure that filters don&#8217;t interfere with non-ad content&#8230; It simply isn&#8217;t their priority.</p><p>Anyway Opera 9.5x is significant update but only a milestone before major version 10. Things might change.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-12</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.Rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-12</guid> <description>Rarst good points. I really like the Opera Mini solution that compresses the content before it delivers it to the user. This, on the other hand, might raise a few alarm signals about privacy.I agree that the ad manager in Opera is not on pair with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox. Opera should really work on this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rarst good points. I really like the Opera Mini solution that compresses the content before it delivers it to the user. This, on the other hand, might raise a few alarm signals about privacy.</p><p>I agree that the ad manager in Opera is not on pair with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox. Opera should really work on this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.rarst.net @ 2010-03-18 06:05:12 -->