<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving browsing bandwidth &#8211; is Opera alone enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Opera Mini is excellent on mobile phone but I am not sure it belongs to desktop like people try to use it.

I think it&#039;s unlikely for Opera to implement really functional ad blocker. It may be relatively easy to code but it has a lot of upkeep costs - updating block lists, making sure that filters don&#039;t interfere with non-ad content... It simply isn&#039;t their priority.

Anyway Opera 9.5x is significant update but only a milestone before major version 10. Things might change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera Mini is excellent on mobile phone but I am not sure it belongs to desktop like people try to use it.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s unlikely for Opera to implement really functional ad blocker. It may be relatively easy to code but it has a lot of upkeep costs &#8211; updating block lists, making sure that filters don&#8217;t interfere with non-ad content&#8230; It simply isn&#8217;t their priority.</p>
<p>Anyway Opera 9.5x is significant update but only a milestone before major version 10. Things might change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Rarst.net/software/saving-browsing-bandwidth-is-opera-alone-enough/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Rarst good points. I really like the Opera Mini solution that compresses the content before it delivers it to the user. This, on the other hand, might raise a few alarm signals about privacy. 

I agree that the ad manager in Opera is not on pair with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox. Opera should really work on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rarst good points. I really like the Opera Mini solution that compresses the content before it delivers it to the user. This, on the other hand, might raise a few alarm signals about privacy. </p>
<p>I agree that the ad manager in Opera is not on pair with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox. Opera should really work on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

