<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PicPick Tools &#8211; best screenshot tool candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: MWSnap &#8211; old but useful screenshot tool &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-21989</link>
		<dc:creator>MWSnap &#8211; old but useful screenshot tool &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-21989</guid>
		<description>[...] Archives get updates June 12th, 2010 Software &#124; ReplyMWSnap &#8211; old but useful screenshot toolPicPick Tools, one of the most promising screenshot tools, had recently changed to more restrictive license – [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archives get updates June 12th, 2010 Software | ReplyMWSnap &ndash; old but useful screenshot toolPicPick Tools, one of the most promising screenshot tools, had recently changed to more restrictive license – [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Access slow or blocked sites with Coral cache &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-13932</link>
		<dc:creator>Access slow or blocked sites with Coral cache &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-13932</guid>
		<description>[...] PicPick Tools homepage has started blocking me (no idea why, usually this is a case of crazy ant-spam plugin) and since I needed access for Appnews updates… I searched and found Coral – distributed content delivery system that can act as proxy and cache for online resources. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PicPick Tools homepage has started blocking me (no idea why, usually this is a case of crazy ant-spam plugin) and since I needed access for Appnews updates… I searched and found Coral – distributed content delivery system that can act as proxy and cache for online resources. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fact that it comes
with a bunch of other tools
—most, if not all, of which
I do not really want— is a
minus&quot;

The thing here being that a ~lot~ of tools ...most of which you&#039;ll
probably never use... is GOOD.  There&#039;s no way an application
developer can intuit exactly what tools/features you&#039;ll want or need.
So multitudinous feature options makes it all the more likely that
the tools you ~do~ want shall be there.

If you don&#039;t need 95% of a feature set, then ignore those features !
Ain&#039;t like you ~must~ use &#039;em.

But a profusion of features only increases the chances that tools you
desire will exist. Limited feature sets don&#039;t as much simplify the
interface as decrease your options. Until software developers begin
reading your mind, and customizing applications for each and every
INDIVIDUAL user, a large feature set shall be the only way to assure
the few tools you want are going to be present.


The DataRat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fact that it comes<br />
with a bunch of other tools<br />
—most, if not all, of which<br />
I do not really want— is a<br />
minus&#8221;</p>
<p>The thing here being that a ~lot~ of tools &#8230;most of which you&#8217;ll<br />
probably never use&#8230; is GOOD.  There&#8217;s no way an application<br />
developer can intuit exactly what tools/features you&#8217;ll want or need.<br />
So multitudinous feature options makes it all the more likely that<br />
the tools you ~do~ want shall be there.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t need 95% of a feature set, then ignore those features !<br />
Ain&#8217;t like you ~must~ use &#8216;em.</p>
<p>But a profusion of features only increases the chances that tools you<br />
desire will exist. Limited feature sets don&#8217;t as much simplify the<br />
interface as decrease your options. Until software developers begin<br />
reading your mind, and customizing applications for each and every<br />
INDIVIDUAL user, a large feature set shall be the only way to assure<br />
the few tools you want are going to be present.</p>
<p>The DataRat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek Squeaks&#8217; of the Week (#22) &#171; What&#8217;s On My PC</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9940</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Squeaks&#8217; of the Week (#22) &#171; What&#8217;s On My PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9940</guid>
		<description>[...] Rarst.net  PicPick Tools – best screenshot tool candidate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rarst.net  PicPick Tools – best screenshot tool candidate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9939</guid>
		<description>@Rick

You can be even more scared because I also had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freewaregenius.com/2009/05/27/picpick-an-easy-to-use-screen-capture-utility/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;exactly same conversation with Samer of Freeware Genius&lt;/a&gt;.

Guess it is simply very defined situation with king of the hill and largest pretender. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick</p>
<p>You can be even more scared because I also had <a href="http://www.freewaregenius.com/2009/05/27/picpick-an-easy-to-use-screen-capture-utility/">exactly same conversation with Samer of Freeware Genius</a>.</p>
<p>Guess it is simply very defined situation with king of the hill and largest pretender. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9938</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9938</guid>
		<description>Rarst,

You and me have been down this road before with PicPick and FastStone and I mean that in a humorous (good way).  It is staring to scare me, but I&#039;m beginning to think, &quot;we think alike&quot;.  

I do agree, FastStone is the topper and that PicPick is gaining ground.  Great review!

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rarst,</p>
<p>You and me have been down this road before with PicPick and FastStone and I mean that in a humorous (good way).  It is staring to scare me, but I&#8217;m beginning to think, &#8220;we think alike&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I do agree, FastStone is the topper and that PicPick is gaining ground.  Great review!</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9928</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9928</guid>
		<description>@Lyndi

Alt+PrintSreen is proven by time but can only go so far. :) As you make themes and such I think you will find measuring tools convenient as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lyndi</p>
<p>Alt+PrintSreen is proven by time but can only go so far. :) As you make themes and such I think you will find measuring tools convenient as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndi</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9927</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9927</guid>
		<description>This is something I really need. Up till now I have been relying on the old Alt Prt Scr combination. I am off to download right now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something I really need. Up till now I have been relying on the old Alt Prt Scr combination. I am off to download right now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>@Alek

I said that it might become one, not that it is. :) Extras are nice for my taste, beats having to have and switch between bunch of small utilities for measurements and such.

As for screenshots it is rather individual and for most PrintScreen is really enough. But why not indulge with stuff like precise region capture and auto-open in editor of choice? :) Really, taking screenshots is no rocket science, apps for that only aim to improve covenience and add related functions.

Captures cursor (option), no idea on shadows - don&#039;t think I encountered any lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alek</p>
<p>I said that it might become one, not that it is. :) Extras are nice for my taste, beats having to have and switch between bunch of small utilities for measurements and such.</p>
<p>As for screenshots it is rather individual and for most PrintScreen is really enough. But why not indulge with stuff like precise region capture and auto-open in editor of choice? :) Really, taking screenshots is no rocket science, apps for that only aim to improve covenience and add related functions.</p>
<p>Captures cursor (option), no idea on shadows &#8211; don&#8217;t think I encountered any lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alek Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/picpick-tools/#comment-9924</link>
		<dc:creator>Alek Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=448#comment-9924</guid>
		<description>I wonder what (other than portable execution) makes this tool the best in your opinion. The fact that it comes with a bunch of other tools -- most, if not all, of which I do not really want -- is a minus in my eyes. Does it capture mouse cursor? How does it handle shadowed window borders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what (other than portable execution) makes this tool the best in your opinion. The fact that it comes with a bunch of other tools &#8212; most, if not all, of which I do not really want &#8212; is a minus in my eyes. Does it capture mouse cursor? How does it handle shadowed window borders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

