<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paint.COM image editor (Paint.NET wannabe?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>@Vlasta

Well, let&#039;s conclude that server doesn&#039;t like my Opera. I&#039;ve updated post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vlasta</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s conclude that server doesn&#8217;t like my Opera. I&#8217;ve updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>That it is. I had 9.51 and it worked correctly and after upgrading to 9.63, it still works correctly ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That it is. I had 9.51 and it worked correctly and after upgrading to 9.63, it still works correctly ;-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6838</guid>
		<description>@Vlasta

Maybe, only I use 9.63 and hadn&#039;t ever problems downloading MSI files. So weird anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vlasta</p>
<p>Maybe, only I use 9.63 and hadn&#8217;t ever problems downloading MSI files. So weird anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6837</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6837</guid>
		<description>update: it is an Opera bug and it was fixed in version 9.5

http://www.softpedia.com/progChangelog/Opera-for-Windows-without-Java-Changelog-7027.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update: it is an Opera bug and it was fixed in version 9.5</p>
<p><a href="http://www.softpedia.com/progChangelog/Opera-for-Windows-without-Java-Changelog-7027.html">http://www.softpedia.com/progChangelog/Opera-for-Windows-without-Java-Changelog-7027.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6836</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6836</guid>
		<description>Hm, it might be due to mime type (application/x-msdownload) sent by the server... Maybe Opera is changes the extension by the mime type, but who knows for sure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, it might be due to mime type (application/x-msdownload) sent by the server&#8230; Maybe Opera is changes the extension by the mime type, but who knows for sure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6835</guid>
		<description>@Vlasta

Checked in Firefox, got msi. Still getting exe in Opera. Most weird.

I have trouble imaging what can cause such, really strange redirect directive on server?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vlasta</p>
<p>Checked in Firefox, got msi. Still getting exe in Opera. Most weird.</p>
<p>I have trouble imaging what can cause such, really strange redirect directive on server?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6834</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6834</guid>
		<description>hm, I downloaded it with Firefox, IE, Opera and G-Chrome and I always got .msi. If I manually rename it to .exe and run it, I get the error you mentioned in the article. Are you using some kind of download accelerator that can be blamed for the renaming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm, I downloaded it with Firefox, IE, Opera and G-Chrome and I always got .msi. If I manually rename it to .exe and run it, I get the error you mentioned in the article. Are you using some kind of download accelerator that can be blamed for the renaming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6833</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6833</guid>
		<description>@Vlasta

Yep, downloaded from home page (and re-downloaded). I also mentioned that I had checked it with VirusTotal and it was in database so it&#039;s unlikely that file was corrupted.

I don&#039;t have much love for MSI by the way and when that gets stuffed in EXE I suspect things can get wacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vlasta</p>
<p>Yep, downloaded from home page (and re-downloaded). I also mentioned that I had checked it with VirusTotal and it was in database so it&#8217;s unlikely that file was corrupted.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have much love for MSI by the way and when that gets stuffed in EXE I suspect things can get wacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6832</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6832</guid>
		<description>That really is suspicious - did you download it from the homepage or from another source? Maybe someone has tampered with it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really is suspicious &#8211; did you download it from the homepage or from another source? Maybe someone has tampered with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/paintcom/#comment-6831</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=288#comment-6831</guid>
		<description>@Vlasta

I am aware what MSI is, I was referring to mismatch between link and actual download.

Strange or not I hadn&#039;t problems installing software for months (and back then it was Java-related). And I try a lot of apps. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vlasta</p>
<p>I am aware what MSI is, I was referring to mismatch between link and actual download.</p>
<p>Strange or not I hadn&#8217;t problems installing software for months (and back then it was Java-related). And I try a lot of apps. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

