<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything – fast and powerful file search utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-130957</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-130957</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-130853&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@Joseph&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Yeah, Vista is not really known for good search implementation. When it just came out disabling search indexing there was almost mandatory to get computer moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-130853"><strong>@Joseph</strong></a></p>
<p>Yeah, Vista is not really known for good search implementation. When it just came out disabling search indexing there was almost mandatory to get computer moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-130853</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 08:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-130853</guid>
		<description>This is a really nice tool. I downloaded it after I tried getting Vista&#039;s search to delete all files with (1) in it&#039;s name in a certain folder for an hour... Amazingly fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really nice tool. I downloaded it after I tried getting Vista&#8217;s search to delete all files with (1) in it&#8217;s name in a certain folder for an hour&#8230; Amazingly fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchMyFiles &#8211; flexible files and their duplicates search &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-13630</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchMyFiles &#8211; flexible files and their duplicates search &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-13630</guid>
		<description>[...] It is not inferior to similar utilities, but comparing to those that make use of indexing (like Everything) it definitely feels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is not inferior to similar utilities, but comparing to those that make use of indexing (like Everything) it definitely feels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-11816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-11816</guid>
		<description>@DataRat

I remapped Win+F to Everything with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rarst.net/software/qliner-hotkeys/&quot;&gt;qliner hotkeys&lt;/a&gt;. Really convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DataRat</p>
<p>I remapped Win+F to Everything with <a href="http://www.rarst.net/software/qliner-hotkeys/">qliner hotkeys</a>. Really convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-11796</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-11796</guid>
		<description>My experience with XP indexing is the same as your&#039;s. But on Vista
have found it works well without slowing either the search or the
machine down.

Only thing: As mentioned, the default indexing isn&#039;t inclusive of
your entire hard drive. This can be changed, but Microsoft ~doesn&#039;t~
recommend it. I changed the defaults so that Vista also indexes
Program Files. Haven&#039;t noticed the slightest slowdown having done so.

Vista searches with indexing are faster than XP searches with indexing
turned off. This on laptops with 5200-rpm hard drives and 2-gHz CPU.
( My main machine is a 64-bit Dell with 4-gigs of RAM. )

But, again, Everything is superior. I only use the Vista search box
for it&#039;s convenience ...being quickly available in the task bar or an
Explorer window.


The DataRat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with XP indexing is the same as your&#8217;s. But on Vista<br />
have found it works well without slowing either the search or the<br />
machine down.</p>
<p>Only thing: As mentioned, the default indexing isn&#8217;t inclusive of<br />
your entire hard drive. This can be changed, but Microsoft ~doesn&#8217;t~<br />
recommend it. I changed the defaults so that Vista also indexes<br />
Program Files. Haven&#8217;t noticed the slightest slowdown having done so.</p>
<p>Vista searches with indexing are faster than XP searches with indexing<br />
turned off. This on laptops with 5200-rpm hard drives and 2-gHz CPU.<br />
( My main machine is a 64-bit Dell with 4-gigs of RAM. )</p>
<p>But, again, Everything is superior. I only use the Vista search box<br />
for it&#8217;s convenience &#8230;being quickly available in the task bar or an<br />
Explorer window.</p>
<p>The DataRat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-11776</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-11776</guid>
		<description>@DataRat

Well, I heard plenty of bad things about indexing in Vista as well. No personal opinion, XP user here.

I&#039;ve tried Google Desktop but it was also heavy on resources and I didn&#039;t like results much. It is most interesting for distributed search over local network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DataRat</p>
<p>Well, I heard plenty of bad things about indexing in Vista as well. No personal opinion, XP user here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried Google Desktop but it was also heavy on resources and I didn&#8217;t like results much. It is most interesting for distributed search over local network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-11745</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-11745</guid>
		<description>The Vista-haters can say what they want, but indexing in XP actually
SLOWS DOWN the search utility ! Microsoft drastically improved search
in Vista. Indexing isn&#039;t a negative in Vista like it has been in XP.

That said, Everything is fantastic.

For starters: Default indexing on Vista doesn&#039;t include much of the
hard drive&#039;s contents (e.g., Program Files). Whereas, Everything
includes ...well, everything !

Plus you can perform some boolean search.

Google Desktop search has some interesting and useful features.
And, as mentioned, Microsoft dramatically improved Vista&#039;s native
search over XP&#039;s. Yet neither are as good as Everything !


The DataRat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vista-haters can say what they want, but indexing in XP actually<br />
SLOWS DOWN the search utility ! Microsoft drastically improved search<br />
in Vista. Indexing isn&#8217;t a negative in Vista like it has been in XP.</p>
<p>That said, Everything is fantastic.</p>
<p>For starters: Default indexing on Vista doesn&#8217;t include much of the<br />
hard drive&#8217;s contents (e.g., Program Files). Whereas, Everything<br />
includes &#8230;well, everything !</p>
<p>Plus you can perform some boolean search.</p>
<p>Google Desktop search has some interesting and useful features.<br />
And, as mentioned, Microsoft dramatically improved Vista&#8217;s native<br />
search over XP&#8217;s. Yet neither are as good as Everything !</p>
<p>The DataRat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>Best &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-9583</guid>
		<description>[...] Everything – redefines file search. Lightning speed and powerful filtering improve file managing as much as inventing file managers itself did in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everything – redefines file search. Lightning speed and powerful filtering improve file managing as much as inventing file managers itself did in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-7740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-7740</guid>
		<description>@Iggi

It could as well rip time-space continium. :) Tricks that go into software that beats competition by giant margin are usually too boring for end-user.

Anyway Everything is great example of what is possible when stepping out of generic realm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Iggi</p>
<p>It could as well rip time-space continium. :) Tricks that go into software that beats competition by giant margin are usually too boring for end-user.</p>
<p>Anyway Everything is great example of what is possible when stepping out of generic realm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggi</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/software/everything/#comment-7739</link>
		<dc:creator>Iggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=345#comment-7739</guid>
		<description>&quot;However I have no idea what kind of magic they used but it is blazing fast.&quot;
That is a special street magic and also reason why it is locked to NTFS only. It reads NTFS structures in bulk into memory and then parses them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However I have no idea what kind of magic they used but it is blazing fast.&#8221;<br />
That is a special street magic and also reason why it is locked to NTFS only. It reads NTFS structures in bulk into memory and then parses them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

