<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Three kinds of software I totally don’t get</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/</link> <description>cynical thoughts on software, web, etc</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: The DataRat</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-11739</link> <dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-11739</guid> <description>&quot;If you have trouble moving
bits of text around why not
make notes or something&quot;Yeah, you could do ~that~. But THAT is what a clipboard extender
does ...and does automatically for you !The Windows clipboard is arguably the single most ingenious and
valuable OS tool (as opposed to interface element) of all time.
Clipboard extenders simply MULTIPLY THE BENEFIT.Yes, for ~some~ people they&#039;re &quot;useless&quot;. Not everything is for
everybody. But that&#039;s the way geeks are: If it don&#039;t help ME, then
nobody ought use it !For those of us doing the type of thing where re-use of text is a
frequent issue, the clipboard remembering multiple snippets can only
be described as INVALUABLE.The only remaining issue being retrieval. How easily accessible
are the contents of your extended clipboard ? This where the great
clipboard extenders are separated from second and third best. And
why I use ClipX.Virtual desktops being a different matter. If one desktop is good,
three desktops aren&#039;t necessarily three times better.Depends how you work. I rarely maximize any application window.
Hence, I can see (and click on) the window immediately behind without
leaving the mouse (actually, trackball) to alt-tab window switch.
I also run &quot;Send to Back&quot;, an old orphanware utility for easily moving
the topmost window behind all other windows. Then I have True Launch
Bar...http://www.truelaunchbar.com/...enhancing Vista&#039;s Quick Launch to access programs via the taskbar
without clearing the desktop.Yet I also have True Launch Bar&#039;s virtual desktop utility providing
three additional desktops should they be needed. Which is very rarely.The DataRat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you have trouble moving<br
/> bits of text around why not<br
/> make notes or something&#8221;</p><p>Yeah, you could do ~that~. But THAT is what a clipboard extender<br
/> does &#8230;and does automatically for you !</p><p>The Windows clipboard is arguably the single most ingenious and<br
/> valuable OS tool (as opposed to interface element) of all time.<br
/> Clipboard extenders simply MULTIPLY THE BENEFIT.</p><p>Yes, for ~some~ people they&#8217;re &#8220;useless&#8221;. Not everything is for<br
/> everybody. But that&#8217;s the way geeks are: If it don&#8217;t help ME, then<br
/> nobody ought use it !</p><p>For those of us doing the type of thing where re-use of text is a<br
/> frequent issue, the clipboard remembering multiple snippets can only<br
/> be described as INVALUABLE.</p><p>The only remaining issue being retrieval. How easily accessible<br
/> are the contents of your extended clipboard ? This where the great<br
/> clipboard extenders are separated from second and third best. And<br
/> why I use ClipX.</p><p>Virtual desktops being a different matter. If one desktop is good,<br
/> three desktops aren&#8217;t necessarily three times better.</p><p>Depends how you work. I rarely maximize any application window.<br
/> Hence, I can see (and click on) the window immediately behind without<br
/> leaving the mouse (actually, trackball) to alt-tab window switch.<br
/> I also run &#8220;Send to Back&#8221;, an old orphanware utility for easily moving<br
/> the topmost window behind all other windows. Then I have True Launch<br
/> Bar&#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://www.truelaunchbar.com/">http://www.truelaunchbar.com/</a></p><p>&#8230;enhancing Vista&#8217;s Quick Launch to access programs via the taskbar<br
/> without clearing the desktop.</p><p>Yet I also have True Launch Bar&#8217;s virtual desktop utility providing<br
/> three additional desktops should they be needed. Which is very rarely.</p><p>The DataRat</p><p>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Master command line file copy &#124; Rarst.net</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-11268</link> <dc:creator>Master command line file copy &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:25:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-11268</guid> <description>[...] of utilities to copy and move files around. For example I absolutely love sync utilities but am puzzled by copy enhancers. Almost same functions but so different [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of utilities to copy and move files around. For example I absolutely love sync utilities but am puzzled by copy enhancers. Almost same functions but so different [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-10629</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-10629</guid> <description>@softwareIt is self-ironic as well. :) As you see from comments there are reasons and people for any kind of software.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@software</p><p>It is self-ironic as well. :) As you see from comments there are reasons and people for any kind of software.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: software application development</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-10622</link> <dc:creator>software application development</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-10622</guid> <description>I can&#039;t stop laughing )) You have written it in a perfectly ironical style. You know, I have never thought about such types of software so it was very interesting for me to read about it. File copy software, it sounds freaking funny. It seems that there are some people that can&#039;t copy files by themselves. The same goes with Clipboard enhancers. I have always found them useless. But people are downloading and using them.. So I don&#039;t know that to think. Better don&#039;t think about this and live your life :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stop laughing )) You have written it in a perfectly ironical style. You know, I have never thought about such types of software so it was very interesting for me to read about it. File copy software, it sounds freaking funny. It seems that there are some people that can&#8217;t copy files by themselves. The same goes with Clipboard enhancers. I have always found them useless. But people are downloading and using them.. So I don&#8217;t know that to think. Better don&#8217;t think about this and live your life :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ClipX &#8211; minimalistic clipboard manager &#124; Rarst.net</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-10085</link> <dc:creator>ClipX &#8211; minimalistic clipboard manager &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-10085</guid> <description>[...] on software I don’t get brought a lot of discussion (trying to straight my wrong ways mostly). One of my readers szekelya [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on software I don’t get brought a lot of discussion (trying to straight my wrong ways mostly). One of my readers szekelya [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Readers suggest &#8211; best SQLite tools digest &#124; Rarst.net</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-9108</link> <dc:creator>Readers suggest &#8211; best SQLite tools digest &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:07:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-9108</guid> <description>[...] separate review on each one so I decided to combine them in a digest format. There were some other highly discussed posts on software recently so more digests will probably [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] separate review on each one so I decided to combine them in a digest format. There were some other highly discussed posts on software recently so more digests will probably [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-8942</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:34:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-8942</guid> <description>@KaneOn copying files all seem to agree that there was that specific case when... I guess it&#039;s of more use as specialized software than daily.Thanks for suggestion, will check it out! :)Ouch, it will take good chunk of time to dig through all of software titles mentioned in these comments. The best part is I don&#039;t know most - which makes it much more valuable experience.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kane</p><p>On copying files all seem to agree that there was that specific case when&#8230; I guess it&#8217;s of more use as specialized software than daily.</p><p>Thanks for suggestion, will check it out! :)</p><p>Ouch, it will take good chunk of time to dig through all of software titles mentioned in these comments. The best part is I don&#8217;t know most &#8211; which makes it much more valuable experience.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kane</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-8941</link> <dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:30:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-8941</guid> <description>File Copy UT:  I tend to agree except that I recently had to move 1000s of (legitimate) mp3s to a new hard drive.  Fastcopy was so much faster than windows copy that I&#039;ll probably use it in the future.Virutal Desktops:  Thank you!  I thought maybe I was alone in thinking they were useless.  I have yet to find a situation where one would be useful to me.Clipboard enhancers: This is something I&#039;ve always used so I disagree there.  I use the one that&#039;s part of TrueLaunchBar and find it very useful.  If you haven&#039;t checked out TLB you should do so.  It&#039;s always part of my fresh installs and is totally unobtrusive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File Copy UT:  I tend to agree except that I recently had to move 1000s of (legitimate) mp3s to a new hard drive.  Fastcopy was so much faster than windows copy that I&#8217;ll probably use it in the future.</p><p>Virutal Desktops:  Thank you!  I thought maybe I was alone in thinking they were useless.  I have yet to find a situation where one would be useful to me.</p><p>Clipboard enhancers: This is something I&#8217;ve always used so I disagree there.  I use the one that&#8217;s part of TrueLaunchBar and find it very useful.  If you haven&#8217;t checked out TLB you should do so.  It&#8217;s always part of my fresh installs and is totally unobtrusive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: szekelya</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-8937</link> <dc:creator>szekelya</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:31:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-8937</guid> <description>@Terry:
&quot;Also, wouldn’t these software hog resources while your machine is running? Even if the effect is minimal with regards to the performance of the computer, I still think it’s better to stay with the simple ways of doing things.&quot;Two out of the three categories mentioned in the opening post:
-Virtual desktop managers - VirtuaWin:3MB RAM
-Clipboard enhancers - ClipX 420KB
-Total amount of memory in my PC: 4GIGS
I only mention this to open a new aspect of such discussions: The best way of ensuring low memory consumption and CPU usage is to keep these pieces of hardware in a drawer. But hey, why did I purchase them in the first place? :)Of course I&#039;m not encouraging anyone to install every piece of malware out there, but useful applications that are found best in class on fine forums like this for example is out there to use them and to make your life simpler.
By this I define &quot;simple&quot; not &quot;the less applications installed the simpler&quot; but &quot;the less user interaction utilizing smart applications the simpler&quot;. For me actually, not for my PC though, but this is why I&#039;m running a dual core laptop with loads of RAM.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terry:<br
/> &#8220;Also, wouldn’t these software hog resources while your machine is running? Even if the effect is minimal with regards to the performance of the computer, I still think it’s better to stay with the simple ways of doing things.&#8221;</p><p>Two out of the three categories mentioned in the opening post:<br
/> -Virtual desktop managers &#8211; VirtuaWin:3MB RAM<br
/> -Clipboard enhancers &#8211; ClipX 420KB<br
/> -Total amount of memory in my PC: 4GIGS<br
/> I only mention this to open a new aspect of such discussions: The best way of ensuring low memory consumption and CPU usage is to keep these pieces of hardware in a drawer. But hey, why did I purchase them in the first place? :)</p><p>Of course I&#8217;m not encouraging anyone to install every piece of malware out there, but useful applications that are found best in class on fine forums like this for example is out there to use them and to make your life simpler.<br
/> By this I define &#8220;simple&#8221; not &#8220;the less applications installed the simpler&#8221; but &#8220;the less user interaction utilizing smart applications the simpler&#8221;. For me actually, not for my PC though, but this is why I&#8217;m running a dual core laptop with loads of RAM.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/dont-get/#comment-8934</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:54:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=398#comment-8934</guid> <description>@TerryTry &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rarst.net/software/screenshoting-edit-compress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paint.NET&lt;/a&gt; it&#039;s what Paint should be. :)I am not professional programmer (ok, sometimes I am by literal definition). I can only say that being programmer can be different. Some create apps of their dreams for a living, some land in terrible boring coding jobs.It is curious how many of apps (especially smaller ones) are coded as hobby.I&#039;d rephrase - it is cool to learn programming and being able to create things you want with it. Is it profession or not for you is secondary.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terry</p><p>Try <a
href="http://www.rarst.net/software/screenshoting-edit-compress/">Paint.NET</a> it&#8217;s what Paint should be. :)</p><p>I am not professional programmer (ok, sometimes I am by literal definition). I can only say that being programmer can be different. Some create apps of their dreams for a living, some land in terrible boring coding jobs.</p><p>It is curious how many of apps (especially smaller ones) are coded as hobby.</p><p>I&#8217;d rephrase &#8211; it is cool to learn programming and being able to create things you want with it. Is it profession or not for you is secondary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk

Served from: www.rarst.net @ 2010-03-17 06:20:51 -->