<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Comodo Firewall and why you need one</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/</link> <description>cynical thoughts on software, web, etc</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tomas</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-16596</link> <dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:19:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-16596</guid> <description>That is vary good firewall. Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is vary good firewall. Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-9565</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:56:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-9565</guid> <description>@ChocobitoNope, I used Zone Alarm before Comodo but it had stupid quirks that drove me crazy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chocobito</p><p>Nope, I used Zone Alarm before Comodo but it had stupid quirks that drove me crazy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chocobito</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-9552</link> <dc:creator>Chocobito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:48:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-9552</guid> <description>I hear very good thing about the new Oupost Firewall 2009 Free, in Matousec this its in a high rank that Comodo, you are tried this?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear very good thing about the new Oupost Firewall 2009 Free, in Matousec this its in a high rank that Comodo, you are tried this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-9550</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:01:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-9550</guid> <description>@ChocobitoYep, Defense+ module can be annoying. :) Luckily there is option to choose how much do you want it to interfere (or disable and leave firewall only) at install or at any time in settings.I am running it on moderate and in last few versions it got tweaked to be unobtrusive enough at this level.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chocobito</p><p>Yep, Defense+ module can be annoying. :) Luckily there is option to choose how much do you want it to interfere (or disable and leave firewall only) at install or at any time in settings.</p><p>I am running it on moderate and in last few versions it got tweaked to be unobtrusive enough at this level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chocobito</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-9543</link> <dc:creator>Chocobito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:19:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-9543</guid> <description>Really I don&#039;t like Firewall like Comodo that came with a really stubborn HIPS, is like the Firewall control my PC, not my. Because that I prefer a pure Firewall and a good Antimalware, nothing like HIPS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really I don&#8217;t like Firewall like Comodo that came with a really stubborn HIPS, is like the Firewall control my PC, not my. Because that I prefer a pure Firewall and a good Antimalware, nothing like HIPS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-6192</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:43:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-6192</guid> <description>@NiharCome back and share your opinion when you do. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nihar</p><p>Come back and share your opinion when you do. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nihar</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-6158</link> <dc:creator>Nihar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:12:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-6158</guid> <description>Never heard of this firewall before. Let me check it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of this firewall before. Let me check it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-5723</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-5723</guid> <description>@JonnyI am careful with all those big tests. They are good to see approximate picture but no test can reliably emulate Internet with all its threats.Still Comodo does good on those which can&#039;t be negative. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonny</p><p>I am careful with all those big tests. They are good to see approximate picture but no test can reliably emulate Internet with all its threats.</p><p>Still Comodo does good on those which can&#8217;t be negative. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonny</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-5720</link> <dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:16:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-5720</guid> <description>I love comodo firewall and have it running on two machines. Have never had any &quot;forgets settings&quot; problems but have had cpu spike problems and hanging occasionally. Will accept these for second to none protection this app offers.
Top Program!
It&#039;s consistently top or close to top on Matousec which I believe to be the authority on firewalls currently:
http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love comodo firewall and have it running on two machines. Have never had any &#8220;forgets settings&#8221; problems but have had cpu spike problems and hanging occasionally. Will accept these for second to none protection this app offers.<br
/> Top Program!<br
/> It&#8217;s consistently top or close to top on Matousec which I believe to be the authority on firewalls currently:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php">http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.rarst.net/software/comodo-firewall/#comment-5716</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:33:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=278#comment-5716</guid> <description>@DonaceYeah, I remember early versions having CPU spikes and hanging when stuff tried to elevate access and spiraled into lockdwon.3.x version is much smoother.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donace</p><p>Yeah, I remember early versions having CPU spikes and hanging when stuff tried to elevate access and spiraled into lockdwon.</p><p>3.x version is much smoother.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.rarst.net @ 2010-03-18 03:51:16 -->