<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kingston SSDNow V+ SNV225-S2 solid state disk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/</link>
	<description>cynical thoughts on software and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CrystalDiskMark &#8211; simple read/write drive benchmark &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-20866</link>
		<dc:creator>CrystalDiskMark &#8211; simple read/write drive benchmark &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 15:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-20866</guid>
		<description>[...] benchmark I recently had few conversations on Twitter with Viper007Bond about SSDs (I totally dig my Kingston one) and CrystalDiskMark came up as benchmark tool. I had previously posted about CrystalDiskInfo and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] benchmark I recently had few conversations on Twitter with Viper007Bond about SSDs (I totally dig my Kingston one) and CrystalDiskMark came up as benchmark tool. I had previously posted about CrystalDiskInfo and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speccy &#8211; basic system info tool from Piriform &#124; Rarst.net</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-18945</link>
		<dc:creator>Speccy &#8211; basic system info tool from Piriform &#124; Rarst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-18945</guid>
		<description>[...] as P45… so does Speccy;SSD are still bit of cutting edge, but find their way in consumer PCs; my Kingston SNV225 drive has most SMART attributes different from HDDs… Speccy fails miserably to interpret them or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as P45… so does Speccy;SSD are still bit of cutting edge, but find their way in consumer PCs; my Kingston SNV225 drive has most SMART attributes different from HDDs… Speccy fails miserably to interpret them or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14866</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14866</guid>
		<description>@DataRat

I am not infected with thirst for gigabytes. :) My current storage is only these 64GB SSD + 500GB HDD. Heh, I have about 1TB worth of drives just lying around unconnected.

Yes, it&#039;s more easy than ever to get multy-terabyte storage in desktop PC. But why bother if I don&#039;t need that much.

Currently I have 40GB used on SSD - that is WindowsXP, all of my software (portable and setup packages) and ~15GBs of recent anime and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DataRat</p>
<p>I am not infected with thirst for gigabytes. :) My current storage is only these 64GB SSD + 500GB HDD. Heh, I have about 1TB worth of drives just lying around unconnected.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s more easy than ever to get multy-terabyte storage in desktop PC. But why bother if I don&#8217;t need that much.</p>
<p>Currently I have 40GB used on SSD &#8211; that is WindowsXP, all of my software (portable and setup packages) and ~15GBs of recent anime and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14814</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14814</guid>
		<description>.

&quot;You mean you need
128GB overall or
that much for system
disk alone ?&quot;

.

No. I mean that 64-gigs is too little to mess with. Anything
under 128-gigs being a waste of a perfectly good hard drive
connector ! ( And I&#039;d only consider 128-gigs for a spectacular
drive ...like an SSD. Normally I wouldn&#039;t think of anything
less than 500-gigs when adding/replacing a storage drive. )

Yeah, an OS will fit on 64-gigs IF YOU WANT TO DEDICATE AN
ENTIRE PHYSICAL DRIVE TO THE OPERATING SYSTEM. But then there&#039;s
proggies which insist on installing themselves in the system
drive. And accumulating DLL&#039;s and other application-related
system files. Pretty soon 64-gigs gets filled up.

Having your OS on a different physical drive than the drive
containing applications is, of course, ideal. But in a day
when hard drives can be a terabyte, or bigger, 64-gig drives
are ridiculously small !

128-gigs being where I draw the line. Arbitrary, yes. Yet, even
as a system drive, 64-gigs is barely adequate.

.

The DataRat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>&#8220;You mean you need<br />
128GB overall or<br />
that much for system<br />
disk alone ?&#8221;</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>No. I mean that 64-gigs is too little to mess with. Anything<br />
under 128-gigs being a waste of a perfectly good hard drive<br />
connector ! ( And I&#8217;d only consider 128-gigs for a spectacular<br />
drive &#8230;like an SSD. Normally I wouldn&#8217;t think of anything<br />
less than 500-gigs when adding/replacing a storage drive. )</p>
<p>Yeah, an OS will fit on 64-gigs IF YOU WANT TO DEDICATE AN<br />
ENTIRE PHYSICAL DRIVE TO THE OPERATING SYSTEM. But then there&#8217;s<br />
proggies which insist on installing themselves in the system<br />
drive. And accumulating DLL&#8217;s and other application-related<br />
system files. Pretty soon 64-gigs gets filled up.</p>
<p>Having your OS on a different physical drive than the drive<br />
containing applications is, of course, ideal. But in a day<br />
when hard drives can be a terabyte, or bigger, 64-gig drives<br />
are ridiculously small !</p>
<p>128-gigs being where I draw the line. Arbitrary, yes. Yet, even<br />
as a system drive, 64-gigs is barely adequate.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The DataRat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14522</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14522</guid>
		<description>@DataRat

You mean you need 128GB overall or that much for system disk alone?

For me 64Gb is perfectly fine for system drive. If I really had to I might have even fit everything I need on it (it&#039;s entertainment that eats space, not serious stuff).

By the way I also bought new media drive with SSD - 2.5&quot; 500GB hard drive (model listed in table in post). May be more expensive per GB than 3.5&quot; drives but much more compact and quiet.

Now I only need fitting case to buy mini-itx motherboard and pack my desktop in tight small form factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DataRat</p>
<p>You mean you need 128GB overall or that much for system disk alone?</p>
<p>For me 64Gb is perfectly fine for system drive. If I really had to I might have even fit everything I need on it (it&#8217;s entertainment that eats space, not serious stuff).</p>
<p>By the way I also bought new media drive with SSD &#8211; 2.5&#8243; 500GB hard drive (model listed in table in post). May be more expensive per GB than 3.5&#8243; drives but much more compact and quiet.</p>
<p>Now I only need fitting case to buy mini-itx motherboard and pack my desktop in tight small form factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>.

The 128-gig model is $500 ...way out of my price range, and way too expensive for 128-gigs !

These things shall be ~great~ once prices come down. They&#039;re the
future of PC storage ! But a 64-gig drive is too small, and the 128-gig drive too expensive.

When the 128-gig model sells for the current price of a 64-gig model, I&#039;ll definitely buy one.  Nice thing about computer parts: You can always count on future versions being both ~better~ and ~cheaper~ !

The DataRat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>The 128-gig model is $500 &#8230;way out of my price range, and way too expensive for 128-gigs !</p>
<p>These things shall be ~great~ once prices come down. They&#8217;re the<br />
future of PC storage ! But a 64-gig drive is too small, and the 128-gig drive too expensive.</p>
<p>When the 128-gig model sells for the current price of a 64-gig model, I&#8217;ll definitely buy one.  Nice thing about computer parts: You can always count on future versions being both ~better~ and ~cheaper~ !</p>
<p>The DataRat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reformating your computer - WordPress Tavern Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14439</link>
		<dc:creator>reformating your computer - WordPress Tavern Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14439</guid>
		<description>[...] in multiply months between reboots) and got through two (three?..) hardware changes, including recent move to SSD.  WinXP SP3 is extremely stable. Maybe not server-grade but it doesn&#039;t get more stable than that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in multiply months between reboots) and got through two (three?..) hardware changes, including recent move to SSD.  WinXP SP3 is extremely stable. Maybe not server-grade but it doesn&#39;t get more stable than that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek Squeaks&#8217; of the Week (#45) &#171; What&#39;s On My PC</title>
		<link>http://www.rarst.net/hardware/kingston-snv225-s2/#comment-14432</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Squeaks&#8217; of the Week (#45) &#171; What&#39;s On My PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rarst.net/?p=581#comment-14432</guid>
		<description>[...] Rarst.net Kingston SSDNow V+ SNV225-S2 solid state disk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rarst.net Kingston SSDNow V+ SNV225-S2 solid state disk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

